AP Automation Questions CFOs Are Asking in 2025 (and Real Answers)

In 2025, mid-market finance leaders are taking a hard look at accounts payable (AP) automation. Many CFOs, Controllers, and AP/AR Managers at companies with $10M–$250M revenue have serious, specific questions before making the leap. Below, we’ve curated a Q&A thread (in a candid, Reddit-style format) addressing the top questions mid-market CFOs are asking about AP automation in 2025 – with straight answers backed by real data and experience.

‍

Mid-market CFOs we’ve worked with often ask these questions, so we’ll answer them with a direct, conversational tone. No fluff or sales pitches – just honest insights. We’ll draw on industry benchmarks and real-world examples (including Centime case studies like Erdman Holdings, R3, Synergy HomeCare, etc.) to give you authoritative answers. Read on for practical info about time savings, ERP integration, cash flow impacts, ROI, risks, what to look for in a vendor, “free” AP models, and more. A quick comparison table and a final FAQ wrap up the key takeaways.

‍

Q: How much time does AP automation actually save in 2025?

A: Short answer: It can save dozens of hours per week. Many mid-market teams cut their invoice processing time by 50–80%, freeing up finance staff for higher-value work.

‍

Mid-market finance leaders report significant time savings after switching from manual AP to automation. For instance, Erdman Holdings (a family-owned real estate firm) had a single controller managing hundreds of invoices a month. After automating AP, they saved ~20 hours per week on invoice processing. In another case, Synergy HomeCare (a multi-location care services company) saved 40+ hours per month on AP tasks by automating, according to their finance director.

‍

These individual stories align with industry trends. Research shows 56% of companies spend over 10 hours per week on manual AP, while fully automated teams spend less than 1 hour on the same. That’s a dramatic difference. Digital workflows eliminate the need to chase paper approvals or re-enter data, cutting down cycle times.

‍

One AP automation user put it simply:

“We went from a manual AR/AP process to fully automated in very little time. We've cut the time of outstanding invoices down dramatically.” – Lowry C., R3 (Verified G2 review).

‍

What does this mean in practice? Instead of your AP clerk spending every Tuesday and Wednesday typing up invoices and cutting checks, they could reclaim most of that time. Automated invoice capture and approval workflows route bills to the right approvers instantly. AI data extraction reads invoices so your team doesn’t have to manually key them in. The result is faster approvals and payments without constant human intervention.

‍

Mid-market CFOs often find that AP automation frees up at least one FTE’s worth of time in their department. For example, after automating AP, one controller said she could finally focus on strategic tasks rather than “entering and scanning every invoice” herself. Over a year, saving 20 hours a week is like getting ~1,000 hours of work back, which can be redirected to analysis, vendor management, or other finance projects. In short, 2025 AP automation tools can give your team back several workdays each month, which is a huge efficiency gain.

‍

Q: Will it integrate cleanly with NetSuite or Sage Intacct (and our ERP)?

A: Yes – if you choose the right solution. Modern AP automation platforms offer pre-built integrations with popular ERPs like NetSuite, Sage Intacct, QuickBooks, and others, ensuring data flows seamlessly without duplicate entry. The key is bi-directional syncing, so invoice and payment data updates in both systems automatically. When evaluating a solution, ask about supported integrations and customer experiences with your specific ERP.

‍

Mid-market finance teams demand that any AP automation “plays nice” with their existing general ledger or ERP. Integration was a pain point for Erdman Holdings’ controller when her old AP tool didn’t sync with QuickBooks, forcing manual re-entry of invoices. This double-work defeated the purpose of automation. After switching, she chose a platform (Centime) that integrated properly with their accounting system, eliminating duplicate data entry.

‍

Look for vendors that are certified or have established connectors for your ERP. For example, one Finance Operations Manager noted:

“Centime’s seamless integration with NetSuite eliminated the need to log into multiple systems to manage AP… allowing for a two-way data sync.” – Hamza S., CoinFlip

‍

Another user review highlights smooth connectivity with Sage Intacct:

“I no longer have to deal with paperwork and checks. Everything is automated and stored within Centime. Integrates very well with Sage Intacct.” – Lisa N. (Verified G2 review)

‍

These testimonials underscore the importance of choosing a solution that deeply connects to your finance software.

‍

Integration checklist: Mid-market CFOs should ensure an AP automation partner can:

Sync master data – e.g. vendors, GL accounts, departments – so invoices use your ERP’s data.
Push and pull transactions – when an invoice is approved in the AP system, it should post to the ERP automatically (and vice versa for payment status).
Maintain references – attachments (invoice images) and approval logs should be accessible via your ERP, not stuck in a silo.
Handle multi-entity or multi-bank setups if your company has several entities (for example, Erdman’s platform had to accommodate multiple entities and bank accounts under one umbrella).

The good news is 2025’s AP platforms are built API-first. In practice, this means if you’re on NetSuite or Sage Intacct, integration is usually a straightforward configuration, not a custom coding project. Many providers offer plug-and-play connectors (for instance, a NetSuite SuiteApp or a Sage Intacct marketplace app). Before you buy, ask for integration case studies or a demo with your system. A reliable vendor will be happy to show how they connect and may even have references in your industry using the same ERP.

‍

Q: How does AP automation affect cash flow forecasting accuracy?

A: It greatly improves forecasting accuracy by providing real-time visibility into your payables and eliminating manual errors. With automated AP, CFOs get up-to-date data on pending outflows, which leads to more precise cash flow predictions. In fact, companies have seen forecast accuracy improve by ~41% after implementing AP automation.

‍

Here’s why: Cash flow forecasting is only as good as the data feeding it. Many finance teams struggle with forecasting because their data is lagging or incomplete – 98% of finance leaders in one 2024 survey said they struggle with forecasting when relying on manual processes. If invoices sit unentered for weeks or if spreadsheet errors slip in, your cash projections become guesswork.

‍

AP automation turns this around by ensuring every invoice and payment is captured in real time. When a bill comes in, it’s scanned and recorded immediately, and its due date and amount are visible to the finance team. No more surprises of discovering a stack of invoices after you’ve done your cash forecast. As one guide put it, “Think about your local weather forecast. Would you trust someone looking at the sky, or advanced radar? AP automation is your financial radar.” In other words, automation gives you data-driven clarity instead of estimates based on stale info.

‍

Specific benefits for forecasting include:

Higher data quality: Automated data capture means far fewer typos or missed entries. Eliminating manual entry errors makes forecasts far more reliable.
Real-time liability tracking: You see what bills are due when, instantly. This allows the treasury or FP&A team to adjust forecasts on the fly as new payables come in.
Identification of patterns: With historical AP data in one system, you can spot seasonal spending trends (e.g. higher costs in Q4) and build those into your projectionstax1099.com.
Improved scenario planning: Some AP platforms integrate with cash management dashboards.

All these factors lead to tighter forecasting windows. Instead of, say, 70% accuracy on cash forecasts, companies can push into the 90%-plus accuracy range with the help of AP automation. Moreover, 65% of AP teams now actively support their business’s financial planning and forecasting efforts – indicating that AP data is increasingly feeding into cash forecasts. By automating AP, CFOs gain timely insight into outgoing cash flows, making it much easier to anticipate shortfalls or surpluses. The CFO can trust that the cash flow forecast includes all committed outflows, which in 2025’s volatile environment is key to making informed decisions. Bottom line: better AP data = better cash forecasting.

‍

Q: What are the risks of automating AP without dedicated internal IT?

A: Surprisingly, not having in-house IT is usually not a deal-breaker for AP automation – many mid-market firms with lean teams still succeed with cloud-based AP solutions. However, the risks if unmanaged include integration hiccups, security gaps, or user adoption issues. You can mitigate these by choosing a vendor with strong implementation support and by involving your finance team (and maybe a part-time IT advisor) in the setup.

‍

Modern AP automation software is typically cloud-based (SaaS), meaning the vendor handles the heavy IT lifting (server maintenance, updates, security patches). This is good news for companies with no dedicated IT staff – you won’t need to install complex on-premise software or manage infrastructure. For example, several Centime customers are small finance teams who managed to get up and running without an internal IT department, leaning on the vendor’s team for support. Mid-market CFOs we speak to often have this concern, but in practice, AP automation today is designed for end-users, not IT specialists.

‍

That said, here are a few risks and how to address them:

Integration and data flow issues: If you lack IT, you might worry about connecting the AP system to your ERP or bank. Mitigation: Pick a solution with proven plug-in integrations for your systems (as discussed above). The vendor’s implementation team should assist with setup. (Remember Erdman Holdings’ issue: their previous provider didn’t integrate with QuickBooks, causing manual work. They resolved this by switching to a provider that handled integration smoothly.)
Security and access management: Without IT, who ensures the new AP system is secure and properly configured? Mitigation: Choose a reputable vendor that is SOC 1/2 compliant and has role-based access controls out of the box. Also involve an IT consultant or your ERP admin in security reviews if possible. The cloud providers often have enterprise-grade security – for example, AP automation tools commonly include secure digital audit trails and approval controls to prevent fraud (features which actually reduce risk compared to manual processes).
Lack of internal “ownership”: No IT team means the finance team must “own” the system. If nobody internally learns the software, you risk under-utilizing it. Mitigation: Make someone on the finance team the AP automation champion. Vendors will train your staff; take advantage of that. Ensure process documentation is created. Many providers, like Centime, are praised for hands-on customer support – one customer noted the team was “super responsive… email back within an hour” whenever she had questions. Leverage that support so your team gains confidence in managing the system.

In short, the main risk is if you choose a tool that isn’t user-friendly or a vendor that doesn’t support you. The technology itself has evolved to require minimal IT intervention – for example, Five Guys (a company with 100+ locations) deployed an AP automation solution in under 30 minutes of IT time for integration. But if you don’t have IT, you do need a reliable partner. Look for an AP vendor with a “white-glove” onboarding service.

‍

Mid-market finance leaders often cite this as a deciding factor: Erdman’s controller mentioned direct interactions with the AP vendor’s CEO as a sign of their commitment to customer success, which influenced her decision. Not every provider will go that far, but at minimum, ensure you’ll have a dedicated implementation specialist or account manager to guide you. With that support, even a tiny finance team can automate AP without internal IT – and actually reduce overall IT burden (since you eliminate clunky manual systems like scanning to shared drives, etc.).

‍

Q: How long does it take to implement AP automation (and will it disrupt operations)?

A: Implementation is much faster than it used to be. In 2025, a mid-market company can typically go live with a cloud AP solution in a matter of weeks, not months. Some agile teams have done initial setup in a few days. For example, the finance team at Five Guys UK integrated an AP automation tool in <30 minutes and configured workflows in under 2 weeks. Realistically, for a mid-market firm, you should budget a few weeks for testing and training, but major disruption isn’t common – you can often run the new system in parallel with old processes for a short period to ensure everything’s working.

‍

Key phases and timeline: Usually, the project involves (1) connecting to your ERP/accounting software (which, with modern APIs, might just be an admin login and data sync that takes a day or two), (2) importing vendor data and historical info (a week or two, depending on volume, often assisted by the vendor), (3) configuring approval workflows (a few planning sessions with your team), and (4) user training (one or two sessions). Many mid-market CFOs are surprised that the longest part is often waiting for internal alignment and training, not the technical setup.

‍

One user, Lowry from R3, highlighted the quick turnaround: “We went from a manual process to fully automated through Centime in very little time.” The ramp-up was rapid, allowing them to enjoy the benefits almost immediately.

‍

To avoid disruptions, it’s wise to run the new system in parallel for one AP cycle. For instance, enter a set of invoices in both the old way and the new software to double-check accuracy, or start with a subset of vendors. Because most AP automation tools are cloud-based, you’re not “turning off” your existing accounts payable on day one – it’s more about gradually shifting workflows. Also, today’s solutions often have intuitive interfaces; your approvers can approve on emails or a mobile app with minimal learning curve, so business users adapt quickly.

‍

In summary, implementing AP automation in 2025 is a fast, manageable project. With a solid vendor and plan, you could be fully live in a month or so. The process is more about configuring to your needs than technical heavy lifting. Finance leaders should still allocate time for their team to adapt, but you do not need a long drawn-out IT project. Many have described the go-live process as “smooth” and “effortless” thanks to good vendor support – meaning you can start reaping benefits (like time savings and better visibility) in the same quarter you kick off the project.

Q: What ROI can CFOs expect when switching from manual to automated AP?

A: The ROI is typically very compelling. By switching from manual to automated AP, mid-market companies often cut processing costs by 60–80% and boost staff productivity dramatically. You can expect to save on labor hours, reduce errors (avoiding costly mistakes or late fees), and capture more early payment discounts. Some modern AP platforms even generate cashback or interest, further improving ROI by offsetting the software cost. Many CFOs see payback in well under a year.

‍

Let’s break down the ROI components:

Cost per invoice drops: Manually processing a single invoice can cost anywhere from about $10 to $15 (considering staff time, paper, etc.) for the average company. Best-in-class automated operations bring that down to the low single digits – often around ~$3 or less per invoice. For example, one analysis found automating AP cut cost per invoice from $8.81 down to $2.43 (a 72% decrease). If you process thousands of invoices a year, that’s a big dollar savings.
Labor and efficiency gains: As discussed, a mid-market finance team might save hundreds of hours annually. This can translate to avoiding additional hires or allowing your team to handle more volume with the same headcount. It’s not about firing staff – it’s about redeploying them to more value-added tasks (analysis, vendor negotiations, etc.). Productivity can increase nearly 90% when routine tasks are automated.
Error reduction and compliance: Fewer errors mean less cost from fixing mistakes (e.g., duplicate payments, which can be surprisingly expensive to unwind). Automated systems catch duplicates and flag anomalies – one stat says companies using AP automation catch 95% of duplicate payments before they go out. This directly safeguards cash and avoids the hassle of reversing payments. Also, automation creates an audit trail, potentially saving costs during audits or compliance checks.
Faster cycle times = financial benefits: With invoices approved faster (often days vs. weeks), you can take advantage of early payment discounts more often. Many suppliers offer 1–2% discounts for paying within 10 days. If your manual process made you miss those windows, automation can now let you consistently capture them – which is essentially free money improving your margins. Conversely, you’ll also avoid late payment fees because it’s far easier to stay on schedule.
Cash flow and working capital improvements: Better visibility into payables can help optimize working capital. Some companies find they can negotiate better terms with suppliers or strategically time payments now that they have real-time info. This is a softer ROI element but still important (e.g., paying a bit slower to hold cash when you can, or paying early when there’s a discount – either way, improving cash position).
Cashback/rebates: A unique trend by 2025 is AP solutions that actually earn you cashback or interest on AP spend. For instance, instead of the provider keeping all the rebate from using virtual cards, some pass a portion to you. Centime has gone a step further by offering a high-yield AP account (around 3.0% APY⁺⁺) on funds used for vendor payments, effectively turning AP into a revenue generator. If your provider offers this, the interest earned can offset your subscription cost entirely, making the ROI essentially immediate (the software “pays for itself”). Not all vendors have this model, but it’s worth considering in your ROI calculator.

To put it all in perspective, consider this comparison of legacy manual AP vs. modern automated AP:

‍

Factor	Manual AP (Legacy Workflow)	Automated AP (Modern Platform)
Processing Time	~17–20 days invoice cycle; lots of waiting for approvals & paper shuffling.	~3–5 days invoice cycle (best-in-class ~3.1 days); digital approvals speed it up.
Cost per Invoice	$10–15 (or more) per invoice to process (labor, overhead, errors).	~$2–5 per invoice with automation (minimal manual work; lower overhead).
Staff Hours per Week	>10 hours/week spent on invoice processing for many teams.	<1 hour/week on processing (once automated) – staff oversee exceptions only.
Error/Exception Rate	~20% of invoices have issues – errors, mismatches, etc.	<10% exception rate – AI validation reduces errors.
Payment Speed & Discounts	Hard to consistently hit early pay windows; prone to late payments if something stalls.	On-time payments easily managed; can capture early pay discounts (1–2% savings) frequently.
Visibility & Control	Fragmented data (invoices in emails, papers); hard to forecast cash needs accurately.	Real-time dashboard of all payables; improves cash forecasting accuracy (up to ~41% better).
Fraud Risk	Higher – paper processes can be manipulated, harder to track approvals.	Lower – system enforces controls, digital audit trails, and flags anomalies for review.

‍

Table: Legacy manual AP versus modern automated AP in 2025.

‍

As the table shows, the differences are stark. For CFOs, the ROI often shows up in both quantitative savings and qualitative improvements (like better supplier relationships and happier staff). For a hard dollar figure: if you process, say, 5,000 invoices a year at $10 each, that’s $50k annual cost. Cutting that to $3 each with automation brings it to $15k – saving $35k/year right there. Add the value of any discounts captured and hours saved, and you can see why many CFOs consider AP automation “low-hanging fruit” for efficiency gains.

‍

In 2025, with the added bonus of potential rebate models, some companies even turn AP into a minor profit center. One fintech CEO noted that by earning interest on the float, businesses can “offset the cost of services, potentially turning a profit on AP transactions while also benefiting from efficiency”. That might sound too good to be true, but it’s part of the ROI equation now.

‍

Finally, consider the opportunity cost: What could your finance team do if they weren’t bogged down in AP minutiae? Many CFOs find that automating AP not only delivers direct ROI, but also frees capacity for strategic initiatives (which can drive revenue or additional savings). All things considered, the ROI for mid-market companies is typically high, with payback periods often well under 12 months and accumulating benefits thereafter.

‍

Q: What should finance leaders look for in an AP software partner in 2025?

A: Look for a partner that checks all the key boxes: integration, scalability, strong support, robust features, security, and a proven track record. In 2025, there are many AP automation vendors, but finance leaders should evaluate them on several criteria:

‍

🏷️ Pricing Model & ROI: Understand how they charge (subscription, per transaction, etc.) and the total cost of ownership. Ensure the vendor is transparent about fees. For instance, some providers may tout “free” models (via rebates) – clarify if you still pay anything upfront. Ask for an ROI analysis or case studies. A credible vendor will help estimate your cost savings and even offset models (like interest on float).
🔌 Integration & Compatibility: As discussed, seamless integration with your ERP/accounting system (NetSuite, Sage Intacct, QuickBooks, etc.) is essential. The solution should fit into your existing tech stack without a hitch. If you use multiple systems (e.g., a separate procurement or expense system), check compatibility or APIs. Bi-directional sync is ideal. Also consider bank integration for payments (e.g., does it connect to your bank or require you to use theirs?).
📈 Scalability & Flexibility: Your AP needs might double in a few years if your business grows or you acquire another company. Make sure the software can handle increasing invoice volumes and additional entities or business units. It should allow configuration for your approval workflows and adapt to your processes, not force you into a one-size-fits-all. (For example, a very basic tool might work for a small biz but mid-market firms often outgrow entry-level solutions like Bill.com as their complexity grows.)
🔒 Security & Compliance: Finance data is sensitive. Verify the vendor’s security certifications (SOC 1/SOC 2, GDPR compliance, etc.) and fraud prevention features. Payment controls (like two-factor authentication for releasing funds, positive pay integration with banks, etc.) are a plus to prevent fraud. Audit trail and compliance reporting features are important if you have to satisfy auditors or SOX controls.
✨ Features & Innovation: Core AP automation features should include OCR/AI invoice capture, purchase order matching, customizable approval workflows, a supplier self-service portal, and electronic payments (ACH, virtual card, etc.). In 2025, also look for modern perks like AI-driven analytics, predictive insights (e.g., cash flow forecasting integration), and perhaps working capital tools (some AP platforms double as cash management platforms). Ensure the vendor’s roadmap aligns with future needs – e.g., are they investing in AI, do they update the product frequently?

‍

One CFO noted being impressed by a vendor’s “intuitive features” and understanding of user needs, which gave confidence the platform would continue to evolve with them.

🤝 Customer Support & Partner Mentality: This one is huge for mid-market. Unlike enterprise firms, you may not have an army of IT people to babysit the system, so the vendor’s support is critical. Evaluate their reputation – do they offer a dedicated account manager? What do their references say about support responsiveness? For example, Synergy HomeCare’s team praised Centime’s support: “always super responsive… within an hour”. Also, consider the onboarding process – will they help tailor the system to your needs? Erdman Holdings valued that Centime’s team “took the time to understand [our] unique structure” and tailored the setup accordingly. A true partner will be invested in your success, not just selling software.
📚 Track Record and References: Look at the vendor’s existing customer base. Do they have clients of your size and industry? Reading case studies (like those we’ve cited) or third-party reviews (G2, etc.) can reveal a lot. For instance, knowing that companies similar to yours saved X hours or achieved Y ROI with the vendor provides confidence. It’s also worth examining if the vendor has partnerships (with banks, with ERP companies, etc.) as a sign of maturity.

To sum up, finance leaders in 2025 should choose an AP automation partner, not just a product. The above checklist (price, integration, scalability, security, features, support, track record) will help filter out options. For example, if a vendor can’t easily integrate with Sage Intacct or NetSuite – cross them off. If they don’t offer a supplier portal or electronic payments – they may not be up to modern standards. And if they can’t provide reference clients or dodge questions on support, that’s a red flag.

‍

One more tip: consider the vendor’s business model alignment with your success. Some newer AP automation players make money through your payment volume (e.g., rebates or float interest). Such models can be fine (even advantageous), but make sure that means they are incentivized to help you process more volume efficiently (which is good), and not incentivized to lock you in or upsell unnecessary services. Transparency is key. Ultimately, the right partner will demonstrate value as a solution consultant, understanding mid-market finance pains (like lean teams, multiple systems, cash flow focus) and addressing them – rather than just pushing features. When you find a partner like that, AP automation becomes a strategic asset, not just another software.

‍

Q: Are “free” AP models with rebate structures legit — or is there a catch?

A: The so-called “free” AP automation models – where the provider earns money through payment rebates or interest instead of charging you – can be legitimate and even beneficial, but you should read the fine print. There’s no magic here: the provider is monetizing your AP payments (often via interchange fees on virtual card payments, or interest earned on funds held) to subsidize the software cost. The catch is making sure that arrangement aligns with your needs and doesn’t limit your flexibility.

‍

How these models work: Some AP automation companies offer their platform at low or no subscription cost, funding it by taking a slice of rebates or float:

Rebate model: If you pay vendors via a virtual credit card, the card issuer provides a rebate (a percentage of the transaction) – traditionally, the AP provider keeps this as revenue. In a free model, the provider might share it with you or use it entirely to waive your fees. For example, if you have $1M of payables and can put, say, 20% of that on a virtual card with a 1% rebate, that yields $2,000. The provider banks on enough volume across clients to earn profit, while you potentially pay nothing out of pocket for the software.
Interest on float model: Some providers (like Centime) offer a high-yield AP account where your payable funds sit briefly. They secure a high interest rate (3.0% APY⁺⁺) on those funds. That interest can cover the software fee. Essentially, “instead of your provider profiting off your float, your business earns interest – effectively making the software free.”. Centime’s 2025 offering of interest on AP funds is an example – companies could offset subscription costs and even come out ahead.

So, are these deals too good to be true? Not necessarily. They’re a different way of paying for the service. Many mid-market CFOs are intrigued by the idea of AP becoming a profit center. If your AP spend is large and you can channel it through the recommended methods, you might indeed cover all your costs.

‍

However, consider these points (the "catches"):

Vendor acceptance: If the model relies on virtual card rebates, it only works if your suppliers agree to be paid by card. Some vendors resist card payments due to fees or process preferences. So you might find only a portion of your AP spend can go through the rebate program. If only, say, 10% of your payments earn rebates, the “free” math might not pan out – you could end up paying for the rest of the software or missing the expected benefit.
Feature limitations: Sometimes “free” versions of software might have limited features, with premium features costing extra. Make sure you’re actually getting the full AP automation capabilities you need, not a stripped-down version. Many rebate-funded models do offer full functionality, but always double-check.

In practice, many mid-market companies are successfully leveraging these models. There isn’t a sinister catch; it’s more about suitability. If you have a lot of payables and a decent portion can go through virtual card or a float account, you could turn AP automation into a zero-cost or even net-positive deal. For example, one CFO commented on a new AP solution that “allows businesses to earn cash-back interest, effectively turning AP functions into profit-generating centers”. That reflects the genuine opportunity here.

‍

On the other hand, if your vendor mix or internal policy means you’ll mostly be doing ACH/wire (which have low or no rebates), a pure rebate model might not cover everything – you might prefer a traditional subscription model or one like Centime’s that leverages interest on all payments (not just card payments).

‍

Bottom line: These “free” or rebate-funded AP automation offers in 2025 are legit – they’re an innovative way to fund the software. The key is to go in with eyes open: evaluate your vendor payment mix, confirm the terms, and ensure the provider still delivers on support and features (since you want them to care about your success even if you’re not paying a direct fee). Many providers in this space succeed by building volume, which means they have every reason to make you a happy long-term customer. If it pencils out, it can be a win-win: you get a fully automated AP process and the provider’s revenue comes from the flow of funds rather than your budget. Just avoid being lured solely by “free” – make sure the solution itself meets your needs; if it does, enjoying a no-cost model is icing on the cake.
‍

Wrapping It Up: What CFOs Are Really Looking for in 2025

The questions mid-market CFOs are asking about AP automation in 2025 aren’t theoretical — they’re rooted in real operational pressures: lean finance teams, scattered systems, growing complexity, and rising expectations from leadership. Whether it’s reclaiming hours from manual tasks, tightening cash forecasts, or simply getting out from under a mountain of approvals, the value of automation is no longer a question of “if” — it’s about choosing the right path forward.

From what we’ve seen across NetSuite and Sage Intacct-based teams, the finance leaders who succeed with AP automation are the ones who ask tough questions upfront, involve their team in the decision, and demand more from their tools — better integration, clearer ROI, and real support.

If your AP process still runs on inboxes and spreadsheets, now’s the time to rethink what your team could be doing instead. And if budget is holding you back, know that modern platforms — including options like Centime — are proving that automation can not only pay for itself but even boost your bottom line through interest-bearing AP accounts and rebates.

In 2025, automation isn’t about adding more software. It’s about removing friction. The right platform should feel like a partner — not another project.

Sign up for our newsletter
to get finance insights and cash planning tips delivered straight to your inbox twice per week.

AP Automation Questions CFOs Are Asking in 2025 (and Real Answers)

You may also like

The AP/AR Tech Stack for Mid-Market Businesses ($20M+ Revenue)

NetSuite Cash 360 vs. AI-Driven Forecasting: What’s Missing for Mid-Market CFOs?

Solutions

Features

Pricing

Integrations

Resources

Software Solutions

Company

Industries

Compare

Guides